 .  , ,     
 


        ,    ,              .        , ,   ?        ,         ,   .    ,              ,    ,   ,        .            ,     ,       ,            .

  PDF A4   .





 

 .  , ,     



Stuart Ritchie

Science Fictions. Exposing Fraud, Bias, Negligence and Hype in Science



 Stuart Ritchie 2020

 .,    , 2024

 .,  , , 2024

    , 2024

 CORPUS 


* * *


 


    .    ,    .

  Brass Eye[1 - Morris. et al. Paedogeddon! // Brass Eye. Series 2. Episode 1. 26 July 2001.]









      ,      ,  [2 -  ..]

    (1620)[3 - BaconF. Novum Organum. New York: P.F.Collier & Son, 1620/1902. [ .   // .  2- . . 2. .: , 1972.]]

  2011   ,     .

      :                        .    -  ,         ,    .       ,          ,   [4 - BemD.J. Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100, no. 3 (2011): 40725.]. ,    ,     .

   ,     .      .       .     ,     .  ,           ,   ,   .       ,    .    ,      ,    .      .   .     - ,    ,     :      49,8% ,     ,  ,   .     -        ,       ,     :  53,1% ,   .       .    ,   ,             ,     [5 -     :        ,     ,      48,3%     ,        , -   .].

      ,    .              .           ,    .               .    .  ,            ,    ,            ,     .       ,  ,             -       ,  .       , , ,       .     ,     .           .

 ,    ,       .   ,       ,     ,   ,      ,   .     :     ,     ,            ,          ,         .   ,      , ,      ,  ,       ,     ,   , ,      .     .     : ,       ,       ,  . ,   -   .

             ,     , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.        .       ,   ,        ,   -  ,    ,     [6 - AldhousP. Journal Rejects Studies Contradicting Precognition. New Scientist. 5 May 2011.].

   ,   ?   ,         ,      ,  ,      ,   .              ,  ,      The Colbert Report,      ,   [7 - The Colbert Report. Time Travelling Porn  Daryl Bem. 2011.].           ,          [8 -              : RitchieS.J. et al. Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bems Retroactive Facilitation of Recall Effect. PLOS ONE. 7, no. 3 (2012): e33423. ,        ,       (WagenmakersE.-J. et al. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100, no. 3 (2011): 42632),        (BemD.J. et al. Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101, no. 4 (2011): 7169).                .   ,             .].

      ,         .  Science,          (   Nature),    ,       .         ,      ,  ,                [9 - StapelD.A., LindenbergS. Coping with Chaos: How Disordered Contexts Promote Stereotyping and Discrimination. Science. 332, no. 6026 (2011): 2513.].              .         Nature;        Sydney Morning Herald[10 - BallP. Chaos Promotes Stereotyping. Nature. 7 April 2011; PhillipsN. Where Theres Rubbish Theres Racism. Sunday Morning Herald. 11 April 2011.].          ,          ,    ,             [11 - StapelD.A., LindenbergS. Coping with Chaos.].

   ,     .    , ,       .  ,     ,         ,           .        2011       ,     .     [12 - Levelt Committee et al. Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel [English Translation]. 28 Nov. 2012.].

 -,    ,  :        ,                   ,     , -  .    ,   ,  .       ,    .   ,  ,      :  ,  ,  [13 - StapelD.A. Faking Science: A True Story of Academic Fraud. Tr.Brown N.J.L.Strasbourg, France, 2014, 2016. http://nick.brown.free.fr/stapel]. ,         .    ,     , ,     , ,   ,    ,    , ,           [14 -  .].

 ,        ,    ,     , ,  -   ,              .     .              .                  -  .

    ,         ()    () ,          .         ?        ?  ,           ,    .

         .    ,    ,    -   ,  -  ,    ,    - .     .    ,           ,   .       ,         :  -   ,     .

,     ,     ,       (-     ,   [15 - ,            . ,   XX  ,    ,    ,          ,     .               . : MiltonM.J. T., PossoloA. Trustworthy Data Underpin Reproducible Research. Nature Physics. 16, no. 2 (2020): 1179.],   , ,    ),     ,        .    ,    ,    ,   ,             [16 -        ,          ,      : IJzerman H. et al. Perceptual Effects of Linguistic Category Priming: The Stapel and Semin (2007) Paradigm Revisited in Twelve Experiments. Acta Psychologica. 157 (2015): 239.        (          )  : ZwaanR. When Replicating Stapel is not an Exercise in Futility. Zeitgeist. 18 Jan. 2015.].  ,   ,       ,    ,  ,       .       ,    ,       ?

,                      .      ,  ,                ,   ,        .     ,     .       ,  ,     ,     [17 -  : EngberD. Daryl Bem Proved ESP Is Real: Which Means Science Is Broken. Slate. 7 June 2017.].

,   ,   - .     , ,          ,       ,      . ,    ,    .    ,         ,      ,       , ,     .  ,        ,   ,     .           . ,         ,  ,    .     ,      ,  .

          ,  :  , , ,     ,               ,     [18 -    : SaganC. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Ballantine Books, 1997. [ . ,  .      . .: , 2021.]].    .       : ,   ,        .   ,     ,      ,     , ,   .               .



      ,      ,       .     ,            ,  .         ,  ,       ,   , ,  ,        .      ,        ,      ,          .        ,          ,    .     ,     :        ,        .

,    ,   ,   .  ,    ,         ,            ,      .   ,  ,            .  ,           ,    .          ,   ,   ,     ( ),  ( ),  ( )         ( ).

         .     :     ,         ,     -     ,      , ,         . ,      ,           ,                .

   - ,             .  ,   ,     [19 -           ,                   .  ,       ,        ,   -   ,    .     ,       .     ,     .    , ,   ,       ,   ,        . ,      ,   ,        . ., : RitchieS.J. et al. Polygenic Predictors of Age-Related Decline in Cognitive Ability. Molecular Psychiatry. 25 (2020): 258498;       : RitchieS.J. et al. Irlen Colored Overlays Do Not Alleviate Reading Difficulties. Pediatrics. 128, no. 4 (2011): e9328. -    ,                     (.      ).        , ,      (       ). . Bailey D.H., LittlefieldA.K. Does Reading Cause Later Intelligence? Accounting for Stability in Models of Change. Child Development. 88, no. 6 (2017): 191321.      -,  ,       . . Ritchie S.J. et al. Alcohol Consumption and Lifetime Change in Cognitive Ability: A Gene ? Environment Interaction Study. AGE. 36, no. 3 (2014): 9638.        :                       ,    -       .    , ,        ,      .    :    ,     ,  ,        - .   ,      -    .].            -     .    ,        (   )      . , ,       , , ,               ,      .

              ,      .          .              ,      .         ,       ,     .

   .                   .    ,      : , , ,     ,   ,     .                 .        -      ,     ,      ,     ,      .



     ,    ,    .   ,        -       (,   ,      ,       ),    ,   ?         ,        ?      ,    -    ,   ,   ,            ?         ,     ,    ,   ?       :    ,     .

 ,             ,        .     .     ,      ,    ,    .         ,          ,     ,     :            , ,    .

    ,    .             . ,          ,    . ,     ,    -  :   ,    ,           .

   .    ,               ,     .          ,       (    ,     ,  , ,   ,      ):        .   ,         ,       .        ,   ,     ,  .

 ,  , ,    ,     .




 I.         





 1.   


 ,         ,  ,         [20 -  .. . :  :   . .: , 2019.].

     (1777)[21 - HumeD. Of Essay-Writing // Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1777.]

    .

   -     ,  ,     .        ,      , ,    ,  ,     ,                          ,      [22 - SokalA., BricmontJ. Intellectual Impostures. London: Profile Books, 1998, 2003.].   ,  ,   ,             ,         .  ,        . ,            ,  ,     ,  -    .                .

       .     -    ,        ,    .   -    .    ,      -,      .       [23 - MillJ.S. On Liberty. London: Dover Press, 1859. [ ..   //     (I  XX ). .: -, 2000.]]:



   ,           ,      ,    ,   ,    -   ,  ,     ,          ,   , ,     ,  , ,  ,  [24 -  ..].



    ,         ,      ,          , ,         .           .            :  ,   , ,    .        ,           [25 - LonginoH.E. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. .  LonginoH. The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2019; ReissJ., SprengerJ. Scientific Objectivity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2017.].

       .             ,      ,            ,      ,   .  ,        ,              .  :  ,     ,  ,  - .

         .          ,              ,             .       , ,      ,        [26 -                ,           ,  ,      . . Mercier H., SperberD. Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34, no. 2 (2011): 5774.].      ,       .

   ,       . ,       ,          ,     .      ,        ,   ,   ,     ,     .

  ,       ,    ,       .



,     .       .        , ,       .   ,        ,   1665 ,           ,    , Philosophical Transactions: Giving Some Account of the Present Undertakings, Studies, and Labours of the Ingenious in Many Considerable Parts of the World ( ,      ,          )[27 - McDougall-WatersJ. et al. Philosophical Transactions: 350 Years of Publishing at the Royal Society (16652015). London: Royal Society, 2015.    ,         Le Journal des s?avans,   1665       Philosophical Transactions.                    .   Philosophical Transactions         . ,     Le Journal des s?avans   ,  Philosophical Transactions   . . McCutcheon R.P. The Journal Des Scavans and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Studies in Philology. 21, no. 4 (1924): 6268; BanksD. Thoughts on Publishing the Research Article over the Centuries. Publications. 6, no. 1 (2018): 10.].    ,               .                 (          ,     )    ,    ,   .            [28 - DavidP.A. The Historical Origins of Open Science: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Capitalism and Society. 3, no. 2 (2008): 5.].

       ,      . ,                     .     :



            ,    ,    (  9  1664 ,    ),                  ,      , ,               [29 - HookeR. A Spot in One of the Belts of Jupiter. Philosophical Transactions. 1 (1665): 3.].



     ,       Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (   )[30 -  1900       :      ,    . . https://royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstl.].  ,         ,      .             ,    (  Nature  Science,         ,     )   ( American Journal of Potato Research,      )[31 - WareM., MabeM. The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. The Hague, Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 2015.].     ,       Philosophical Transactions,     ,   Elsevier, Wiley  Springer Nature[32 -  ,    XVIII,   Philosophical Transactions     ,       .].           ,    ,    ,    ,      ,    ,       [33 -             ,     ,  ,     -   .].

  ,     ,      . ,   ,         ,    -    .   ,        ,   ,   .       ,      . ,       ,       : ,  ,    ,      ,    .  , ,   ,       ,            .    , -,  ,  ,        .         (NIH)      (   ,    )    ,  ,  Wellcome Trust      [34 - www.nih.gov  www.nsf.gov.     :       (UK Research and Innovation; www.ukri.org),      (National Natural Science Foundation of China; www.nsfc.gov.cn/english/site_1/index.html),     (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; www.jsps.go.jp/english). .  https://wellcome.ac.uk/  www.gatesfoundation.org.].

   ,    ,                 ,      .           ,      .    ,     .     .             ,       ,         ,         ,      .     , , .

   , ,    ,   ,                  (    ,    ).          .      ,    ,           .    ,   ,      ,   ,             .      ,       , ,    .     ,                  ,    .       ,     ,     .       ,          ,          ,      .        ,      ,          [35 - ,           ,          .].

  ,          .    ,     ,          ,       (           -,              ).            (,   ,   ,  )  ,    ,   . ?  ,   ,   ,  ,         (Science, ,   7% ,   ),             [36 - www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/faq/index.xhtml#pct_faq].     :   ,             ,  ,     .   ,   ,   .   - ,      ,  ,       .   ,   ,            ,       .       :     .

 ,  , ,         ,    .   XVII     -   ,           Philosophical Transactions,     1831        [37 - CsiszarA. Peer Review: Troubled from the Start. Nature. 532, no. 7599 (2016): 3068.].      ,     ,   ,      XX,       (      ,     1936    Physical Review,  ,         ,         )[38 -  : BaldwinM. Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability and the Rise of Peer Review in the Cold War United States. Isis. 109, no. 3 (2018): 53858.].   1970-                 ,    ,     [39 -  .].

     ,    ,  .             ,      ,     (           ),     ,   ,        ,      ,    .      :



    .     .

 , - .

,         ,    .

    :    ,    ,   .

    ,     ?     ,   [40 - https://shitmyreviewerssay.tumblr.com].



     , , ,   .     ,     ,       ,      ,   ,     ,              ,      ,      .     ,      ,   ,    ,      - ,     .    -            .   ,    ,       .          ,         ,     ,          .   .       ,      ,              . ,     .

  ,   , ,    ,              .    :  ,    -  ,            ,    ?      .     - .  ,      ,    ,  , ,  ,     ,    ?   ,   ,      ,     ,     ,  ,   [41 -  ,        ,       ,        .  , ,    ,      (  ),    ,               .].            .

 1942      ,     .     ,      .   .        ,   ,  ,      . , , , ,  ,  ,  , ,           ,     .     -    ,      (       ).     .      - ,     ,   (   ,   - )     .         ,    ,  [42 - MertonR.K. The Normative Structure of Science (1942) // The Sociology of Science: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1973.].     ,       ,      [43 - Darwin Correspondence Project, Letter no. 2122, 9 July 1857. www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2122.xml].

        .   .        [44 -     ,   ,  ,   .       ,     . ., : AndersonM.S. et al. Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists Subscription to Norms of Research. Journal of Higher Education. 81, no. 3 (2010): 36693.].            ,       ,    ,       ,       [45 -     ,   ,   XVIII,     :             ,           .].  ,  :  .   ,         .        ,           .          .



    :    ,      ,   ,   ,   ,    ,   . ,    ,        ,  : -  ,              ,    [46 - BestN.W. Lavoisiers Reflections on Phlogiston I: Against Phlogiston Theory. Foundations of Chemistry. 17, no. 2 (2015): 13751.].       ,    .  ,         .     ,    ,           [47 - DawkinsR. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Books, 2006. [ .   . .: , 2018.]].



       ,    (  )     ,     , .            -  .           ,       .         ,   ,   :  ,     .      .       . <>       [   ].           , ,  ,      .              [48 -  ..].



    ,  ,      .   ,        ,        ( ,       ,  ,       ,    [49 - PlanckM. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. London: Williams & Norgate, Ltd., 1949. [., : .  . . 64, 4 (1958): 62537.]]).  :     .     ,  ,     ,     .                   , ,             .

  ,               .                ,    ,        .     ,     :     ,    .         [50 - PopperK. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London & New York: Routledge Classics, 1959/2002. [ .    // .     . .: , 1983.]]:



 ,            (    ),         .                  ,         .           ,       씅[51 -  ..]



           ,     1950- .   XVII,   Philosophical Transactions  ,  ,    ,   ,     ,      .                    ,         ,      [52 -   ,       ,           (  )      ,      .].  ,       ,  ,    ,          [53 - BoyleR. The New Experiments Physico-Mechanical, Touching the Spring of the Air and Its Effects. London: Miles Flesher, 1682. . : ShapinS., SchafferS. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.].        ,                      [54 - ShapinS., SchafferS. Leviathan.].

 ,        ,       ( ,      :      ,     ).    , -      ,       .                       ,     ,  ,    ,    ,    .

    ,     ,    .




 2.  


    

 , ,    [55 -  ..].

  ,  1,  7

     .

 ,     [56 - NosekB.A. et al. Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 61531.]

,                .        ,  .       2002      ()      ,     .       ,     ,       .     :             [57 - KahnemanD. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. [ .    . .: , 2013.]].         ,     .    ( )    . , ,                   ,    ,      ,       ( -    ),       ( -        ).             [58 - NeelyJ. Semantic Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Selective Review of Current Findings and Theories // Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.].

, ,    .       , ,   ,    ,         .       .  2006    Science    , ,          ,        ,    -               ( !).      : ,        ,   ,     ,     ,   .             .   ,      ,            [59 - ZhongC.B., LiljenquistK. Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing. Science. 313, no. 5792 (2006): 14512.].

      .   ,   Science    2006 , ,    , ,       ,    ,           ,        ,    ,     [60 - VohsK.D. et al. The Psychological Consequences of Money. Science. 314, no. 5802 (2006): 11546.].  ,   ,   ,    ,      ?       [61 -  .].  ,               ,   ,               ,     .      , ,  .         :         .

 ,                   [62 -    .].      .  :     .       .        .          [63 - KahnemanD. Thinking, Fast and Slow.].

        ,            . ,              ,  ,             ,   ,     [64 -   ,       ,       ,            . ,       . . Pashler H., WagenmakersE.-J. Editors Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 52830; NelsonL.D. et al. Psychologys Renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology. 69, no. 1 (2018): 51134.].

            ,          .          ,         ,  , , ,    (     ,    ).  ,            ,          .  -      ,  ,       ,         [65 - BarghJ.A. et al. Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71, no. 2 (1996): 23044.].

  1996 ,                        ,     [66 -   (   5208)      2020     Google Scholar.].   2012         ,          ,         .  ,       ,   ,    , ,         ,  , ,    .       ,     -,      [67 - DoyenS. et al. Behavioral Priming: Its All in the Mind, but Whose Mind? PLOS ONE. 7, no. 1 (2012): e29081.].            ,     ,        [68 - EarpB.D. et al. Out, Damned Spot: Can the Macbeth Effect Be Replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 36, no. 1 (2014): 918.   : KleinR.A. et al. Investigating Variation in Replicability: A Many Labs Replication Project. Social Psychology. 45, no. 3 (2014): 14252.].      .   ,      ,  , ,     ,      .    ? ,  .

      .   ,  ,                ,        ;       2012 [69 -  : WilliamsL.E., BarghJ.A. Keeping Ones Distance: The Influence of Spatial Distance Cues on Affect and Evaluation. Psychological Science. 19, no. 3 (2008): 3028. : PashlerH. et al. Priming of Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments. PLOS ONE. 7, no. 8 (2012): e42510.].    ,             ,       ,           ;       2018 [70 -  : ZarkadiT., SchnallS. Black and White Thinking: Visual Contrast Polarizes Moral Judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49, no. 3 (2013): 3559. : IJzerman H., LaineP.-J. Does Background Color Affect Moral Judgment? Three Pre-Registered Replications of Zarkadi and Schnalls (2012) Study 1. Preprint, PsyArXiv (30 July 2018).].   ,       ,    ,       2015 [71 -       ,     .       :                ,             ໔.     . AdamsT.G. et al. The Effects of Cognitive and Affective Priming on Law of Contagion Appraisals. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 3, no. 3 (2012): 473.    : LandyJ.F., GoodwinG.P. Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10, no. 4 (2015): 51836.].

       ,   ,     .   ,     ,   ,   ,   ,            .     : ,       ,    ,     [72 - McCook A. I Placed Too Much Faith in Underpowered Studies: Nobel Prize Winner Admits Mistakes. Retraction Watch. 20 Feb. 2017.     ,   ,   ,    ,        ; . : https://go.nature.com/2T7A2NV.].     :     ,      .

     ,    .       2012 ,       TED,   .   ,      ,   ,     ,  ,   -   (  )   ,  ,         .        .  ,       2010 , ,     ,        , ,     ,      ,                  ,  [73 - CarneyD.R. et al. Power Posing: Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance. Psychological Science. 21, no. 10 (2010): 13638.].

 ,  ,      ,      ,   :     TED                 [74 -        2020       TED  56 ,   YouTube   17,6 .        ,  ,    ,            . CuddyA. Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are. TEDGlobal 2012. June 2012.]. ,  2015 ,         [],     The New York Times,    ,     ,   []      [75 - CuddyA.J. C. Presence: Bringing Your Boldest Self to Your Biggest Challenges. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2015.     : www.littlebrown.com/titles/amy-cuddy/presence/9780316256575.].   , ,   ,        ,                ,    [76 - KhaleeliH. A Body Language Lesson Gone Wrong: Why is George Osborne Standing like Beyonc? The Guardian. 7 Oct. 2015.].    2015         .   ,    ,       , , ,       ,    [77 - RanehillE. et al. Assessing the Robustness of Power Posing: No Effect on Hormones and Risk Tolerance in a Large Sample of Men and Women. Psychological Science. 26, no. 5 (2015): 6536.           .   2017  ,       ,       . . Simmons J.P., SimonsohnU. Power Posing: P-Curving the Evidence. Psychological Science. 28, no. 5 (2017): 68793.     ,  -  ,     ,             ,    , , ,   ,      . . Cuddy A.J. C. et al. P-Curving a More Comprehensive Body of Research on Postural Feedback Reveals Clear Evidential Value for Power-Posing Effects: Reply to Simmons and Simonsohn (2017). Psychological Science. 29, no. 4 (2018): 65666.   . Cred M. A Negative Effect of a Contractive Pose is not Evidence for the Positive Effect of an Expansive Pose: Commentary on Cuddy, Schultz, and Fosse (2018). SSRN. 2018.].

                 . ,              1971 ,                          .  ,   ,    ,    ,      [78 - ZimbardoP. The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn Evil. London: Rider, 2007. [.  .      . .: , 2013.]].    ,   1960-   ,   ,            (     ,      ),             [79 - MilgramS. Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67, no. 4 (1963): 3718.      .    ,     ,      .   ., : PerryG. et al. Credibility and Incredulity in Milgrams Obedience Experiments: A Reanalysis of an Unpublished Test. Social Psychology Quarterly. 83, no. 1 (2020): 88106.]. ,  ,              .          ,  ,             .     , , ,    -     ,      -.  ,  ,    ,  ,      ,         [80 - Zimbardo P. Our inner heroes could stop another Abu Ghraib. The Guardian. 29 Feb. 2008.].

        ,     ,     [81 - FrommE. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975. [.   . .: , 2004.]].  2019               .      ,       ,      ,   ,   ,      ,      [82 - Le TexierT. Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist. 74, no. 7 (2019): 82339.]. ,           ,  ,        .     ,    ,         ,         [83 -  ,     . ., : ZimbardoP. Philip Zimbardos Response to Recent Criticisms of the Stanford Prison Experiment. 23 June 2018. .           (        ): Le TexierT. The SPE Remains Debunked: A Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020). Preprint, PsyArXiv (24 Jan. 2020).].

 , , ,        (   )    (   )      (   )   (  ).      ,  ,  ?     ,   ,              .      ,             .   ,   2015   Science,  :     39%     [84 - Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science. 349, no. 6251 (2015): aac4716.].     2018                    Nature  Science.     62%[85 - CamererC.F. et al. Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour. 2, no. 9 (2018): 63744.].     ,    ,  77, 54  38% [86 -         . EbersoleC.R. et al. Many Labs 3: Evaluating Participant Pool Quality across the Academic Semester via Replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 67 (2016): 6882.].   ,  , ,       .        , ,      [87 -     ,        .     , , ,    ,      ,         .   ,       , ,     .           ,    : GilbertD.T. et al. Comment on Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science. 351, no. 6277 (2016): 1037.          (    : LakensD. The Statistical Conclusions in Gilbert et al (2016) Are Completely Invalid. The 20% Statistician. 6 March 2016),    .     ,         ,     ,         ,    ,    ,   .   ,     ,   ,    ,         , ,  ,    .     ,  ,   , . : PashlerH., HarrisC.R. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 5316.].

,         . -,  ,   ,    ,       [88 - BirdA. Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 13 Aug. 2018.]. -, -    - ,              (,    ,        ,   ,     -   )[89 - ,    (,    )  ,           .     ,         .].      ,     ,    -   .  ,       , , : ,   2015 ,   Science,   ( , ,    )   ,   (     ,  )[90 -  ,   ,  .               ,   ,   ,      ,       .      87%,        ,   . SotoC.J. How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science. 30, no. 5 (2019): 71127.].

        .      ,    ,  ,      ,         (     )     .      ,   -     ,     ,    VI 897       ,  ,     (   ). ,  ,    ,          ,   :        -      .       .



    ,        ,      .    :           ,     , , ,   .   ,   , , , , ,     ,   ,    .       ,         .                 ?

    - :          ,   ,   ,  ,         -  .   ,        :                  ,          .



:   2016 ,      (         ,    ,        ),     61%[91 - CamererC.F. et al. Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics. Science. 351, no. 6280 (2016): 14336.].

:   2018  ,      ,    -    ,    -  (    -),    [92 - TurnerB.O. et al. Small Sample Sizes Reduce the Replicability of Task-Based fMRI Studies. Communications Biology. 1, no. 1 (2018): 62.].      ,   ,     ,      ,   .             10%  , -    [93 - EklundA. et al. Cluster Failure: Why fMRI Inferences for Spatial Extent Have Inflated False-Positive Rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113, no. 28 (2016): 79005; EklundA. et al. Cluster Failure Revisited: Impact of First Level Design and Physiological Noise on Cluster False Positive Rates. Human Brain Mapping. 40, no. 7 (2019): 201732.].

   :     ,        ,       . , ,      ,    ,    ,       (,    ,  ),   ,          [94 - LordK.A. et al. The History of Farm Foxes Undermines the Animal Domestication Syndrome. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 35, no. 2 (2020): 12536.].    , ,   ,       ,       . ,   ,    ,        , ,      ;           (  ), ,    ;  ,           , [95 -  : WangD. et al. Irreproducible Text-Book Knowledge: The Effects of Color Bands on Zebra Finch Fitness. Evolution. 72, no. 4 (2018): 96176. .  LawY.-H. Replication Failures Highlight Biases in Ecology and Evolution Science. The Scientist. 31 July 2018. : Snchez-Tjar A. et al. Meta-analysis challenges a textbook example of status signalling and demonstrates publication bias. eLife. 7 (2008): e37385.  : ParkerT.H. What Do We Really Know about the Signalling Role of Plumage Colour in Blue Tits? A Case Study of Impediments to Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Biological Reviews. 88, no. 3 (2013): 51136.].

 :    2020 ,   , ,    (   ,          )     [96 - ClarkT.D. et al. Ocean Acidification Does Not Impair the Behaviour of Coral Reef Fishes. Nature. 577, no. 7790 (2020): 3705. .  EnserinkM. Analysis Challenges Slew of Studies Claiming Ocean Acidification Alters Fish Behavior. Science. 8 Jan. 2020.      ,  ,   , ,  ,  ,        ,      .     (  )          . . Enserink M. Does Ocean Acidification Alter Fish Behavior? Fraud Allegations Create a Sea of Doubt. Science. 6 May 2021.].  ,       ,   ,   ,                ,    .

 :  Organic Syntheses,                 , ,    7,5%  -    [97 - www.orgsyn.org/instructions.aspx. .  ChawlaD.S. Taking on Chemistrys Reproducibility Problem. Chemistry World. 20 March 2017.].



     :   ,       ,   ,       ,  ,    .    ,     ,     , ,    ,    .   ,    ,  ,  -    ?

  ,      ,   , ,    ,     ,   .          ,           .    0,1%        ;     ,         1%[98 -      ,  ,         ,   ,   , ,     . : Mueller-LangerF. et al. Replication Studies in Economics  How Many and Which Papers Are Chosen for Replication and Why? Research Policy. 48, no. 1 (2019): 6283. : MakelM.C. et al. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 53742.    :   ,     ,  .      ,      ,       .  - ,     ,    ,   ,   .    -   . . Schmidt S. Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences. Review of General Psychology. 13, no. 2 (2009): 90100.].        ,   ,  ,     ,          - ?

   , ,   .  ,        ,      ,        ,   .  ,               .       ,      (      ,       ,     )[99 -    ,         :    (replicability  repeatability)     (reproducibility).                  . ,            ( ,  ,       49   ),         ,        ,   ,   . (    ..)].   ,       ?      .    ,         , ,      ,      ,          .    - -    ,   .      ,    ,     ,        ,     .

  (, ,         )       ,      ,      ,          [100 - ChangA.C., LiP. Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals say Usually Not. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. 2015, no. 83 (2015): 126. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.      : ChristensenG., MiguelE. Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research. Working Paper no. 22989. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2016.].                         [101 - KonkolM. et al. Computational Reproducibility in Geoscientific Papers: Insights from a Series of Studies with Geoscientists and a Reproduction Study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 33, no. 2 (2019): 40829.].            (   ,     Amazon  Netflix,    ,      , ,           ),           ,          [102 -   :                ,        ,     . DacremaM.F. et al. Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approaches. RecSys 2019. Copenhagen, Denmark. .     ,   ,                    ,         ,        ,           . HutsonM. Artificial Intelligence Faces Reproducibility Crisis. Science. 359, no. 6377 (2018): 7256.].        .

  ,         .        -  ,    ,      ,          ,        -      ?      .    ,        :      ,       ,  ,  ,    .        ,       .      ,     ,       . ,  ,   .






,      



   ,      ,     Amgen        ,         (    ,       ,        in vitro[103 -    .])[104 - BegleyC.G., EllisL.M. Raise Standards for Preclinical Cancer Research. Nature. 483, no. 7391 (2012): 5313.].      (   11%)  .     , Bayer,      20%[105 - PrinzF. et al. Believe It or Not: How Much Can We Rely on Published Data on Potential Drug Targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 10 (2011): 712.  ,      Bayer    70%     30%      - .].           ,   ,         :   ,  3,4%             [106 - WongC.H. et al. Estimation of Clinical Trial Success Rates and Related Parameters. Biostatistics. 20, no. 2 (2019): 27386.      ,         ,      13,8%,        .].

    ,  ,   ,      .  2013               [107 - NosekB.A., ErringtonT.M. Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: Making Sense of Replications. eLife. 6 (2017): e23383.      :         ,       (         ).        ,    ,   ,       .].    , ,                        [108 - RepassJ. et al. Replication Study: Fusobacterium Nucleatum Infection is Prevalent in Human Colorectal Carcinoma. eLife. 7 (2018): e25801.].      -  .                 ,    ,      [109 - ErringtonT. Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology  Barriers to Replicability in the Process of Research. 2019. https://osf.io/x9p5s/].     ,            .     ,        ,                  [110 - BakerM., DolginE. Cancer Reproducibility Project Releases First Results. Nature. 541, no. 7637 (2017): 26970; EngberD. Cancer Research Is Broken. Slate. 19 April 2016.]. -   :  45%              [111 - ErringtonT. Reproducibility Project (.  11).]. ,  ,  ,   ,          ,       [112 - KaiserJ. The Cancer Test. Science. 348, no. 6242 (2015): 14113.].

             ,        . ,      ,   ,     .    -,    ,     ,    ,    [113 - IqbalS.A. et al. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature. PLOS Biology. 14, no. 1 (2016): e1002333.  ,      441 ,   268     .].   ,   54%      ,  ,      [114 - VasilevskyN.A. et al. On the Reproducibility of Science: Unique Identification of Research Resources in the Biomedical Literature. PeerJ. 1 (2013): e148. ,     ,    .  , , . WuttkeA. Why Too Many Political Science Findings Cannot Be Trusted and What We Can Do About It: A Review of Meta-Scientific Research and a Call for Academic Reform. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. 60, no. 1 (2019): 119.   . ParkerT.H. et al. Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 31, no. 9 (2016): 7119.].    ,    .         ,            (       ),     ?      XVII   , ,  ,      ,        ,            .      ,           ,  .

                    ,       ,    ,      [115 - KaiserJ. Plan to Replicate 50 High-Impact Cancer Papers Shrinks to Just 18. Science. 31 July 2018.  ,    51    (ErringtonT. Reproducibility Project)    ,   .].              ,    :       (     )  ,     ,       (        ),        [116 -      :   . : https://elifesciences.org/collections/9b1e83d1/reproducibility-project-cancer-biology.]. ,  , .

                  ,    . ,         :        ,           .    ,  -          [117 - PrasadV.K., CifuA.S. Ending Medical Reversal: Improving Outcomes, Saving Lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015.].

         .      (, , ) ,      ,        ,     ,  ,   - .  1990-          ( BIS-     bispectral index).    ,         ,     .      :  2007        ,            [118 - LangJ. Awakening. The Atlantic. Feb. 2013.].  ,        .   2008        , ,  BIS- :   ,   []     [119 - AvidanM.S. et al. Anesthesia Awareness and the Bispectral Index. New England Journal of Medicine. 358, no. 11 (2008): 1097.].

 2019  ,                 ,                [120 - Herrera-PerezD. et al. A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Clinical Trials in Three Medical Journals Reveals 396 Medical Reversals. eLife. 8 (2019): e45183.        ,   146  : PrasadV. et al. A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 88, no. 8 (2013): 7908.].    :



.      , ,    ,         .       (     ).      2013           [121 - BarrettJ.F. R. et al. A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine. 369, no. 14 (2013): 12951305.].

.     ,      ,   ,       .        ,     ,                . ,    ,    :    2015  ,     2%    ,      ,       ,       ,   ,     14%[122 - Du ToitG. et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy. New England Journal of Medicine. 372, no. 9 (2015): 80313.].

 .      ,         ,        . ,    ,      .     2014  ,       ,    , ,         [123 - KimF. et al. Effect of Prehospital Induction of Mild Hypothermia on Survival and Neurological Status Among Adults with Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 311, no. 1 (2014): 4552.].

.    ,  ,  ,       :   , , ,  .          .      2015   ,               [124 - AVERT Collaboration. Efficacy and Safety of Very Early Mobilisation within 24 h of Stroke Onset: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet. 386, no. 9988 (2015): 4655.].    2016  ,         ( ,    ,     ,       )     [125 - BaharogluM.I. et al. Platelet Transfusion versus Standard Care after Acute Stroke Due to Spontaneous Cerebral Haemorrhage Associated with Antiplatelet Therapy (PATCH): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet. 387, no. 10038 (2016): 260513.].



 ,            .       ,       ,   ,  




  .


   .

   ,     (https://www.litres.ru/book/stuart-richi/naukoobraznaya-chush-razoblachenie-moshennichestva-predvzyato-70284787/chitat-onlayn/)  .

      Visa, MasterCard, Maestro,    ,   ,     ,  PayPal, WebMoney, ., QIWI ,       .



notes








1


Morris. et al. Paedogeddon! // Brass Eye. Series 2. Episode 1. 26 July 2001.




2


 ..




3


BaconF. Novum Organum. New York: P.F.Collier & Son, 1620/1902. [ .   // .  2- . . 2. .: , 1972.]




4


BemD.J. Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100, no. 3 (2011): 40725.




5


    :        ,     ,      48,3%     ,        , -   .




6


AldhousP. Journal Rejects Studies Contradicting Precognition. New Scientist. 5 May 2011.




7


The Colbert Report. Time Travelling Porn  Daryl Bem. 2011.




8


             : RitchieS.J. et al. Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bems Retroactive Facilitation of Recall Effect. PLOS ONE. 7, no. 3 (2012): e33423. ,        ,       (WagenmakersE.-J. et al. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100, no. 3 (2011): 42632),        (BemD.J. et al. Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101, no. 4 (2011): 7169).                .   ,             .




9


StapelD.A., LindenbergS. Coping with Chaos: How Disordered Contexts Promote Stereotyping and Discrimination. Science. 332, no. 6026 (2011): 2513.




10


BallP. Chaos Promotes Stereotyping. Nature. 7 April 2011; PhillipsN. Where Theres Rubbish Theres Racism. Sunday Morning Herald. 11 April 2011.




11


StapelD.A., LindenbergS. Coping with Chaos.




12


Levelt Committee et al. Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel [English Translation]. 28 Nov. 2012.




13


StapelD.A. Faking Science: A True Story of Academic Fraud. Tr.Brown N.J.L.Strasbourg, France, 2014, 2016. http://nick.brown.free.fr/stapel




14


 .




15


,            . ,   XX  ,    ,    ,          ,     .               . : MiltonM.J. T., PossoloA. Trustworthy Data Underpin Reproducible Research. Nature Physics. 16, no. 2 (2020): 1179.




16


       ,          ,      : IJzerman H. et al. Perceptual Effects of Linguistic Category Priming: The Stapel and Semin (2007) Paradigm Revisited in Twelve Experiments. Acta Psychologica. 157 (2015): 239.        (          )  : ZwaanR. When Replicating Stapel is not an Exercise in Futility. Zeitgeist. 18 Jan. 2015.




17


 : EngberD. Daryl Bem Proved ESP Is Real: Which Means Science Is Broken. Slate. 7 June 2017.




18


   : SaganC. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Ballantine Books, 1997. [ . ,  .      . .: , 2021.]




19


          ,                   .  ,       ,        ,   -   ,    .     ,       .     ,     .    , ,   ,       ,   ,        . ,      ,   ,        . ., : RitchieS.J. et al. Polygenic Predictors of Age-Related Decline in Cognitive Ability. Molecular Psychiatry. 25 (2020): 258498;       : RitchieS.J. et al. Irlen Colored Overlays Do Not Alleviate Reading Difficulties. Pediatrics. 128, no. 4 (2011): e9328. -    ,                     (.      ).        , ,      (       ). . Bailey D.H., LittlefieldA.K. Does Reading Cause Later Intelligence? Accounting for Stability in Models of Change. Child Development. 88, no. 6 (2017): 191321.      -,  ,       . . Ritchie S.J. et al. Alcohol Consumption and Lifetime Change in Cognitive Ability: A Gene ? Environment Interaction Study. AGE. 36, no. 3 (2014): 9638.        :                       ,    -       .    , ,        ,      .    :    ,     ,  ,        - .   ,      -    .




20


 .. . :  :   . .: , 2019.




21


HumeD. Of Essay-Writing // Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1777.




22


SokalA., BricmontJ. Intellectual Impostures. London: Profile Books, 1998, 2003.




23


MillJ.S. On Liberty. London: Dover Press, 1859. [ ..   //     (I  XX ). .: -, 2000.]




24


 ..




25


LonginoH.E. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. .  LonginoH. The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2019; ReissJ., SprengerJ. Scientific Objectivity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2017.




26


               ,           ,  ,      . . Mercier H., SperberD. Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34, no. 2 (2011): 5774.




27


McDougall-WatersJ. et al. Philosophical Transactions: 350 Years of Publishing at the Royal Society (16652015). London: Royal Society, 2015.    ,         Le Journal des s?avans,   1665       Philosophical Transactions.                    .   Philosophical Transactions         . ,     Le Journal des s?avans   ,  Philosophical Transactions   . . McCutcheon R.P. The Journal Des Scavans and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Studies in Philology. 21, no. 4 (1924): 6268; BanksD. Thoughts on Publishing the Research Article over the Centuries. Publications. 6, no. 1 (2018): 10.




28


DavidP.A. The Historical Origins of Open Science: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Capitalism and Society. 3, no. 2 (2008): 5.




29


HookeR. A Spot in One of the Belts of Jupiter. Philosophical Transactions. 1 (1665): 3.




30


 1900       :      ,    . . https://royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstl.




31


WareM., MabeM. The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. The Hague, Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 2015.




32


 ,    XVIII,   Philosophical Transactions     ,       .




33


            ,     ,  ,     -   .




34


www.nih.gov  www.nsf.gov.     :       (UK Research and Innovation; www.ukri.org),      (National Natural Science Foundation of China; www.nsfc.gov.cn/english/site_1/index.html),     (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; www.jsps.go.jp/english). .  https://wellcome.ac.uk/  www.gatesfoundation.org.




35


,           ,          .




36


www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/faq/index.xhtml#pct_faq




37


CsiszarA. Peer Review: Troubled from the Start. Nature. 532, no. 7599 (2016): 3068.




38


 : BaldwinM. Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability and the Rise of Peer Review in the Cold War United States. Isis. 109, no. 3 (2018): 53858.




39


 .




40


https://shitmyreviewerssay.tumblr.com




41


 ,        ,       ,        .  , ,    ,      (  ),    ,               .




42


MertonR.K. The Normative Structure of Science (1942) // The Sociology of Science: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1973.




43


Darwin Correspondence Project, Letter no. 2122, 9 July 1857. www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2122.xml




44


    ,   ,  ,   .       ,     . ., : AndersonM.S. et al. Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists Subscription to Norms of Research. Journal of Higher Education. 81, no. 3 (2010): 36693.




45


    ,   ,   XVIII,     :             ,           .




46


BestN.W. Lavoisiers Reflections on Phlogiston I: Against Phlogiston Theory. Foundations of Chemistry. 17, no. 2 (2015): 13751.




47


DawkinsR. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Books, 2006. [ .   . .: , 2018.]




48


 ..




49


PlanckM. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. London: Williams & Norgate, Ltd., 1949. [., : .  . . 64, 4 (1958): 62537.]




50


PopperK. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London & New York: Routledge Classics, 1959/2002. [ .    // .     . .: , 1983.]




51


 ..




52


  ,       ,           (  )      ,      .




53


BoyleR. The New Experiments Physico-Mechanical, Touching the Spring of the Air and Its Effects. London: Miles Flesher, 1682. . : ShapinS., SchafferS. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.




54


ShapinS., SchafferS. Leviathan.




55


 ..




56


NosekB.A. et al. Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 61531.




57


KahnemanD. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. [ .    . .: , 2013.]




58


NeelyJ. Semantic Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Selective Review of Current Findings and Theories // Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.




59


ZhongC.B., LiljenquistK. Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing. Science. 313, no. 5792 (2006): 14512.




60


VohsK.D. et al. The Psychological Consequences of Money. Science. 314, no. 5802 (2006): 11546.




61


 .




62


   .




63


KahnemanD. Thinking, Fast and Slow.




64


  ,       ,       ,            . ,       . . Pashler H., WagenmakersE.-J. Editors Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 52830; NelsonL.D. et al. Psychologys Renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology. 69, no. 1 (2018): 51134.




65


BarghJ.A. et al. Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71, no. 2 (1996): 23044.




66


  (   5208)      2020     Google Scholar.




67


DoyenS. et al. Behavioral Priming: Its All in the Mind, but Whose Mind? PLOS ONE. 7, no. 1 (2012): e29081.




68


EarpB.D. et al. Out, Damned Spot: Can the Macbeth Effect Be Replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 36, no. 1 (2014): 918.   : KleinR.A. et al. Investigating Variation in Replicability: A Many Labs Replication Project. Social Psychology. 45, no. 3 (2014): 14252.




69


 : WilliamsL.E., BarghJ.A. Keeping Ones Distance: The Influence of Spatial Distance Cues on Affect and Evaluation. Psychological Science. 19, no. 3 (2008): 3028. : PashlerH. et al. Priming of Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments. PLOS ONE. 7, no. 8 (2012): e42510.




70


 : ZarkadiT., SchnallS. Black and White Thinking: Visual Contrast Polarizes Moral Judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49, no. 3 (2013): 3559. : IJzerman H., LaineP.-J. Does Background Color Affect Moral Judgment? Three Pre-Registered Replications of Zarkadi and Schnalls (2012) Study 1. Preprint, PsyArXiv (30 July 2018).




71


      ,     .       :                ,             ໔.     . AdamsT.G. et al. The Effects of Cognitive and Affective Priming on Law of Contagion Appraisals. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 3, no. 3 (2012): 473.    : LandyJ.F., GoodwinG.P. Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10, no. 4 (2015): 51836.




72


McCook A. I Placed Too Much Faith in Underpowered Studies: Nobel Prize Winner Admits Mistakes. Retraction Watch. 20 Feb. 2017.     ,   ,   ,    ,        ; . : https://go.nature.com/2T7A2NV.




73


CarneyD.R. et al. Power Posing: Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance. Psychological Science. 21, no. 10 (2010): 13638.




74


       2020       TED  56 ,   YouTube   17,6 .        ,  ,    ,            . CuddyA. Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are. TEDGlobal 2012. June 2012.




75


CuddyA.J. C. Presence: Bringing Your Boldest Self to Your Biggest Challenges. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2015.     : www.littlebrown.com/titles/amy-cuddy/presence/9780316256575.




76


KhaleeliH. A Body Language Lesson Gone Wrong: Why is George Osborne Standing like Beyonc? The Guardian. 7 Oct. 2015.




77


RanehillE. et al. Assessing the Robustness of Power Posing: No Effect on Hormones and Risk Tolerance in a Large Sample of Men and Women. Psychological Science. 26, no. 5 (2015): 6536.           .   2017  ,       ,       . . Simmons J.P., SimonsohnU. Power Posing: P-Curving the Evidence. Psychological Science. 28, no. 5 (2017): 68793.     ,  -  ,     ,             ,    , , ,   ,      . . Cuddy A.J. C. et al. P-Curving a More Comprehensive Body of Research on Postural Feedback Reveals Clear Evidential Value for Power-Posing Effects: Reply to Simmons and Simonsohn (2017). Psychological Science. 29, no. 4 (2018): 65666.   . Cred M. A Negative Effect of a Contractive Pose is not Evidence for the Positive Effect of an Expansive Pose: Commentary on Cuddy, Schultz, and Fosse (2018). SSRN. 2018.




78


ZimbardoP. The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn Evil. London: Rider, 2007. [.  .      . .: , 2013.]




79


MilgramS. Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67, no. 4 (1963): 3718.      .    ,     ,      .   ., : PerryG. et al. Credibility and Incredulity in Milgrams Obedience Experiments: A Reanalysis of an Unpublished Test. Social Psychology Quarterly. 83, no. 1 (2020): 88106.




80


Zimbardo P. Our inner heroes could stop another Abu Ghraib. The Guardian. 29 Feb. 2008.




81


FrommE. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975. [.   . .: , 2004.]




82


Le TexierT. Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist. 74, no. 7 (2019): 82339.




83


 ,     . ., : ZimbardoP. Philip Zimbardos Response to Recent Criticisms of the Stanford Prison Experiment. 23 June 2018. .           (        ): Le TexierT. The SPE Remains Debunked: A Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020). Preprint, PsyArXiv (24 Jan. 2020).




84


Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science. 349, no. 6251 (2015): aac4716.




85


CamererC.F. et al. Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour. 2, no. 9 (2018): 63744.




86


        . EbersoleC.R. et al. Many Labs 3: Evaluating Participant Pool Quality across the Academic Semester via Replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 67 (2016): 6882.




87


    ,        .     , , ,    ,      ,         .   ,       , ,     .           ,    : GilbertD.T. et al. Comment on Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science. 351, no. 6277 (2016): 1037.          (    : LakensD. The Statistical Conclusions in Gilbert et al (2016) Are Completely Invalid. The 20% Statistician. 6 March 2016),    .     ,         ,     ,         ,    ,    ,   .   ,     ,   ,    ,         , ,  ,    .     ,  ,   , . : PashlerH., HarrisC.R. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 5316.




88


BirdA. Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 13 Aug. 2018.




89


,    (,    )  ,           .     ,         .




90


 ,   ,  .               ,   ,   ,      ,       .      87%,        ,   . SotoC.J. How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science. 30, no. 5 (2019): 71127.




91


CamererC.F. et al. Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics. Science. 351, no. 6280 (2016): 14336.




92


TurnerB.O. et al. Small Sample Sizes Reduce the Replicability of Task-Based fMRI Studies. Communications Biology. 1, no. 1 (2018): 62.




93


EklundA. et al. Cluster Failure: Why fMRI Inferences for Spatial Extent Have Inflated False-Positive Rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113, no. 28 (2016): 79005; EklundA. et al. Cluster Failure Revisited: Impact of First Level Design and Physiological Noise on Cluster False Positive Rates. Human Brain Mapping. 40, no. 7 (2019): 201732.




94


LordK.A. et al. The History of Farm Foxes Undermines the Animal Domestication Syndrome. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 35, no. 2 (2020): 12536.




95


 : WangD. et al. Irreproducible Text-Book Knowledge: The Effects of Color Bands on Zebra Finch Fitness. Evolution. 72, no. 4 (2018): 96176. .  LawY.-H. Replication Failures Highlight Biases in Ecology and Evolution Science. The Scientist. 31 July 2018. : Snchez-Tjar A. et al. Meta-analysis challenges a textbook example of status signalling and demonstrates publication bias. eLife. 7 (2008): e37385.  : ParkerT.H. What Do We Really Know about the Signalling Role of Plumage Colour in Blue Tits? A Case Study of Impediments to Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Biological Reviews. 88, no. 3 (2013): 51136.




96


ClarkT.D. et al. Ocean Acidification Does Not Impair the Behaviour of Coral Reef Fishes. Nature. 577, no. 7790 (2020): 3705. .  EnserinkM. Analysis Challenges Slew of Studies Claiming Ocean Acidification Alters Fish Behavior. Science. 8 Jan. 2020.      ,  ,   , ,  ,  ,        ,      .     (  )          . . Enserink M. Does Ocean Acidification Alter Fish Behavior? Fraud Allegations Create a Sea of Doubt. Science. 6 May 2021.




97


www.orgsyn.org/instructions.aspx. .  ChawlaD.S. Taking on Chemistrys Reproducibility Problem. Chemistry World. 20 March 2017.




98


     ,  ,         ,   ,   , ,     . : Mueller-LangerF. et al. Replication Studies in Economics  How Many and Which Papers Are Chosen for Replication and Why? Research Policy. 48, no. 1 (2019): 6283. : MakelM.C. et al. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, no. 6 (2012): 53742.    :   ,     ,  .      ,      ,       .  - ,     ,    ,   ,   .    -   . . Schmidt S. Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences. Review of General Psychology. 13, no. 2 (2009): 90100.




99


   ,         :    (replicability  repeatability)     (reproducibility).                  . ,            ( ,  ,       49   ),         ,        ,   ,   . (    ..)




100


ChangA.C., LiP. Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals say Usually Not. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. 2015, no. 83 (2015): 126. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.      : ChristensenG., MiguelE. Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research. Working Paper no. 22989. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2016.




101


KonkolM. et al. Computational Reproducibility in Geoscientific Papers: Insights from a Series of Studies with Geoscientists and a Reproduction Study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 33, no. 2 (2019): 40829.




102


  :                ,        ,     . DacremaM.F. et al. Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approaches. RecSys 2019. Copenhagen, Denmark. .     ,   ,                    ,         ,        ,           . HutsonM. Artificial Intelligence Faces Reproducibility Crisis. Science. 359, no. 6377 (2018): 7256.




103


   .




104


BegleyC.G., EllisL.M. Raise Standards for Preclinical Cancer Research. Nature. 483, no. 7391 (2012): 5313.




105


PrinzF. et al. Believe It or Not: How Much Can We Rely on Published Data on Potential Drug Targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 10 (2011): 712.  ,      Bayer    70%     30%      - .




106


WongC.H. et al. Estimation of Clinical Trial Success Rates and Related Parameters. Biostatistics. 20, no. 2 (2019): 27386.      ,         ,      13,8%,        .




107


NosekB.A., ErringtonT.M. Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: Making Sense of Replications. eLife. 6 (2017): e23383.      :         ,       (         ).        ,    ,   ,       .




108


RepassJ. et al. Replication Study: Fusobacterium Nucleatum Infection is Prevalent in Human Colorectal Carcinoma. eLife. 7 (2018): e25801.




109


ErringtonT. Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology  Barriers to Replicability in the Process of Research. 2019. https://osf.io/x9p5s/




110


BakerM., DolginE. Cancer Reproducibility Project Releases First Results. Nature. 541, no. 7637 (2017): 26970; EngberD. Cancer Research Is Broken. Slate. 19 April 2016.




111


ErringtonT. Reproducibility Project (.  11).




112


KaiserJ. The Cancer Test. Science. 348, no. 6242 (2015): 14113.




113


IqbalS.A. et al. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature. PLOS Biology. 14, no. 1 (2016): e1002333.  ,      441 ,   268     .




114


VasilevskyN.A. et al. On the Reproducibility of Science: Unique Identification of Research Resources in the Biomedical Literature. PeerJ. 1 (2013): e148. ,     ,    .  , , . WuttkeA. Why Too Many Political Science Findings Cannot Be Trusted and What We Can Do About It: A Review of Meta-Scientific Research and a Call for Academic Reform. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. 60, no. 1 (2019): 119.   . ParkerT.H. et al. Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 31, no. 9 (2016): 7119.




115


KaiserJ. Plan to Replicate 50 High-Impact Cancer Papers Shrinks to Just 18. Science. 31 July 2018.  ,    51    (ErringtonT. Reproducibility Project)    ,   .




116


     :   . : https://elifesciences.org/collections/9b1e83d1/reproducibility-project-cancer-biology.




117


PrasadV.K., CifuA.S. Ending Medical Reversal: Improving Outcomes, Saving Lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015.




118


LangJ. Awakening. The Atlantic. Feb. 2013.




119


AvidanM.S. et al. Anesthesia Awareness and the Bispectral Index. New England Journal of Medicine. 358, no. 11 (2008): 1097.




120


Herrera-PerezD. et al. A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Clinical Trials in Three Medical Journals Reveals 396 Medical Reversals. eLife. 8 (2019): e45183.        ,   146  : PrasadV. et al. A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 88, no. 8 (2013): 7908.




121


BarrettJ.F. R. et al. A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine. 369, no. 14 (2013): 12951305.




122


Du ToitG. et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy. New England Journal of Medicine. 372, no. 9 (2015): 80313.




123


KimF. et al. Effect of Prehospital Induction of Mild Hypothermia on Survival and Neurological Status Among Adults with Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 311, no. 1 (2014): 4552.




124


AVERT Collaboration. Efficacy and Safety of Very Early Mobilisation within 24 h of Stroke Onset: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet. 386, no. 9988 (2015): 4655.




125


BaharogluM.I. et al. Platelet Transfusion versus Standard Care after Acute Stroke Due to Spontaneous Cerebral Haemorrhage Associated with Antiplatelet Therapy (PATCH): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet. 387, no. 10038 (2016): 260513.


